A report predicting economic harm from Alberta independence justifies cancelling the October 19 referendum. False. Albertans have the right to examine the competing evidence and decide for themselves.
The Alberta Federation of Labour is calling on Premier Danielle Smith to cancel the October 19 referendum after a government-commissioned report modelled potentially serious economic consequences from Alberta independence.
The AFL claims separation could reduce annual wages by between $5,000 and $12,000 and increase provincial debt to as much as $442 billion.
Those projections have been challenged by critics who dispute the report’s assumptions about debt allocation, negotiations with Canada, trade arrangements, energy revenues and the economic policies an independent Alberta might adopt.
Ad
But set those disagreements aside.
Even if every number in the report were accepted as accurate, it would still provide an argument for voting “no.” It would not provide a democratic justification for preventing Albertans from voting at all.
A referendum campaign exists precisely so competing claims can be presented, scrutinized and judged by voters. Opponents are free to publish reports, organize rallies and warn Albertans about every risk they believe independence would create. Supporters are equally free to challenge those assumptions and explain the opportunities they see.
The AFL’s demand would replace that debate with a political veto. It effectively argues that voters cannot be trusted to consider an economic report and reach the “correct” conclusion themselves.
The October 19 ballot is also not a binding declaration of independence. It asks whether Alberta should begin the legal process toward a future binding referendum. A “yes” vote would trigger further negotiations and debate, not cause Alberta to leave Canada the following morning.
The referendum follows an enormous public mobilization on both sides of the issue. Hundreds of thousands of Albertans signed petitions concerning the province’s future. Cancelling the vote after that level of public participation would not settle the debate. It would tell Albertans their voices count only when political and labour leaders approve of their answer.
Economic forecasts are legitimate campaign material. They are not grounds for cancelling an election.
The AFL is entitled to urge Albertans to vote “no.” It is not entitled to insist that Albertans be denied the vote because it fears they might say “yes.”
Signup
The legacy media is counting on one thing: that you'll see the false headline and never see the correction. Don't let them get away with it.
Sign up for email updates from Alberta Fact Check and we'll send every new fact check straight to you the moment it's published. You'll always know what was said, who said it, and exactly where they got it wrong. It's free, it takes ten seconds, and it's the easiest way to stay one step ahead of the spin.