Supporters of Alberta's independence movement spend an extraordinary amount of time debating facts, history, constitutional questions, economics, and federal-provincial relations.

 

source: The Canadian Press / Jason Franson

Maclean's columnist and CBC panelist Stephen Maher has spent weeks attacking Alberta independence supporters as uninformed, irrational, and unwilling to engage with facts.

In an X post, he claimed that "supporters of Alberta independence are not really focused on debating the facts."

Meanwhile, federalist activist Jenn Jefferys took things a step further, mocking independence supporters as "dingdongs" and suggesting they were illiterate.

That's a curious criticism considering that, to date, there have already been at least two major public debates between former Alberta premier Jason Kenney and constitutional lawyer Keith Wilson, one of the leading advocates for Alberta independence.

They were lengthy discussions covering equalization, federal resource policy, constitutional law, economic viability, trade, Indigenous treaties, and Alberta's future inside or outside Confederation.

You don't have to agree with Wilson's conclusions to acknowledge that these debates happened.

In fact, one of the defining characteristics of Alberta's independence movement is that its supporters spend an extraordinary amount of time debating facts, history, constitutional questions, economics, and federal-provincial relations. Entire conferences, town halls, podcasts, policy papers, books, and public forums have emerged around those questions.

The real problem for some federalist commentators isn't that Albertans won't debate. It's that Albertans are debating.